Skip to content

🧪 [Add comprehensive tests for ollama New function]#82

Merged
matdev83 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
testing-ollama-new-3464184568522072264
Jun 29, 2026
Merged

🧪 [Add comprehensive tests for ollama New function]#82
matdev83 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
testing-ollama-new-3464184568522072264

Conversation

@matdev83

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner
  • 🎯 What: The testing gap in Ollama plugin's New constructor has been addressed. The default initialization logic and auto-probing of the /api/version endpoint for OpenAI Responses API compatibility lacked tests.
  • 📊 Coverage: Added test coverage for:
    • Probing /api/version with HTTP mocks and detecting 0.1.0 vs >=0.13.3.
    • Emitting lipapi.OperationOpenAIResponses support correctly in ResolveTransportCaps depending on the version.
    • Disallowing explicitly openairesponses.model in be.Open on older Ollama versions, emitting errors appropriately.
    • The explicit configuration to force enable or disable ResponsesAPI.
  • Result: Improved test coverage significantly, making the Ollama Backend initialization and mode discovery highly reliable.

PR created automatically by Jules for task 3464184568522072264 started by @matdev83

Addresses the testing gap in Ollama plugin's `New` constructor.
The default initialization logic and auto-probing of the `/api/version`
endpoint for OpenAI Responses API compatibility now has explicit
coverage.

Added test coverage for:
- Probing `/api/version` with HTTP mocks and detecting `0.1.0` vs `>=0.13.3`.
- Emitting `lipapi.OperationOpenAIResponses` support correctly in
  `ResolveTransportCaps` depending on the version.
- Disallowing explicitly `openairesponses.model` in `be.Open` on older
  Ollama versions, emitting errors appropriately.
- The explicit configuration to force enable or disable `ResponsesAPI`.

Co-authored-by: matdev83 <211248003+matdev83@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@matdev83, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 59 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 92034861-369c-4966-933e-61f35de810a0

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 148e610 and 2b7b1d4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • internal/plugins/backends/ollama/plugin_test.go

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Use the repo's _, _ = w.Write(...) idiom for httptest handlers to satisfy errcheck.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
@matdev83 matdev83 merged commit 010ea94 into main Jun 29, 2026
2 checks passed
@matdev83 matdev83 deleted the testing-ollama-new-3464184568522072264 branch June 29, 2026 16:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant